智游城

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

查看: 10683|回复: 37
打印 上一主题 下一主题

7.22現場一手牌

  [复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
1#
sama 发表于 2010-7-22 23:16:17 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
10/20 9人枱,枱子偏緊,sb是一老外有3200比較弱是call station,co+1有5000是一reg風格偏緊,我拿7000在button拿3c3h
perflop前面limp了3家,我limp進去,sb bb call,pot 120元
flop Qc9s3d,全部check到我,我下注100,sb call,co+2 call,co+1 call,pot 520
turn As,sb領先下注350,co+2 fold,co+1 raise到850,到我??
分享到:  QQ好友和群QQ好友和群 QQ空间QQ空间 腾讯微博腾讯微博 腾讯朋友腾讯朋友 微信微信
收藏收藏
2#
 楼主| sama 发表于 2010-7-22 23:20:55 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 sama 于 2010-7-22 23:22 编辑

第二個問題,假設我call了,老外想了一分鐘之後all in,co+1想了半分鐘之後all in,到我??
3#
skizzik 发表于 2010-7-23 00:36:29 | 只看该作者
SB肯定没有AA QQ,CO+1入局前已经有2个limper了估计也肯定没有AA QQ

这里你基本是2nd nuts

可以赢很多AQ A9 A3 AQ Q9之类的牌

我觉得就算deep我也是不fold的,get in
4#
 楼主| sama 发表于 2010-7-23 01:16:01 | 只看该作者
KK,那第一個問題,你會call還是reraise CO+1?
5#
windstormm 发表于 2010-7-23 01:24:54 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 windstormm 于 2010-7-23 01:31 编辑

Raise to 2500. all in river if blank.  Call is bad because if sb has a draw of any kind he will come along for the great odds. Charge him for the draws.
6#
skizzik 发表于 2010-7-23 02:01:09 | 只看该作者
KK,那第一個問題,你會call還是reraise CO+1?
sama 发表于 2010-7-23 01:16



   

如果你要3bet那里,你的目的是把CO+1 get in

如果call,是希望连SB一块get in

如果有人有99,无论re-raise还是call横竖都是一死,那个情况下不存在优化选择的可能

我觉得相对来说,我选择call。这不是一个很wet的牌面,对手的牌往往不会对我们造成很大的听牌的威胁。TJ是唯一值得考虑的,其他都不怕。那么这里就算我们用call形成了free card,也不是什么致命伤。彩池已经很大了,如果他转牌semi-bluff后河牌没有听到,CO+1也未必会简单的check/fold投降这手牌,我们还是有可能从中渔利。而你如果re-raise那里,可以打跑很多很强的牌。
7#
windstormm 发表于 2010-7-23 02:10:02 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 windstormm 于 2010-7-23 02:23 编辑

如果不raise, 你是不可能在river 上all in 的。。board is not dry anymore  after turn, there is flush and several straight draw possibility.  Based on the board and preflop actions, your raise actually represent a very narrow range of strong hand.  With the draws on board, you might just get a shove from 2 pair or big draws (10sJs? which might over estimate their fold equity).  

If you want to win the whole stack, you have to raise turn to set up for river all in.

Edit: Second thought, 2500 is probably too much. I didn't notice that they are actually much shorter stack than you.  you can probably reraise smaller. Just enough to have another reasonable size bet to put co+1 all in on river.
8#
 楼主| sama 发表于 2010-7-23 02:59:39 | 只看该作者
這把牌我不是BUTTON,我是CO+1,但我在想如果我在BUTTON我會怎樣做呢?他如果RERAISE我的RAISE,基本上我AQ以上才會CALL上,FLUSH DRAW和順子DRAW基本我也只會計OUTS決定CALL還是FOLD,但如果他CALL,RIVER如果不出順花的OUTS,我兩對還是會跟他ALL IN的
9#
windstormm 发表于 2010-7-23 03:22:48 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 windstormm 于 2010-7-23 03:24 编辑

assume both of sb co+1 call, pot is 2600.  co+1 and button both have more than 4000 chips left.  button can't put co+1 all in without put in an over pot size bet.  That is not a well planned way to get someone stacked (also better odds for sb to call and if co has a draw, you just gave him a free card). on the other hand, raise to 1800. if sb call, then pot is 5400, you have a a little over half pot size all in on river which is perfect sizing.  if sb fold, then you have less than pot size left for river shove, also good sizing.

especially you mentioned that sb is a weak calling station. So he might come around with any made hand or draws because he might consider that he is commited as short stack. So making co+1 commit became your top priority.
10#
skizzik 发表于 2010-7-23 03:32:06 | 只看该作者
现场这牌对手有任何能call转牌的3bet的牌,面对flat几乎必然还会bet river,3000的锅至少会打个1500-2000,你全下他还是commit了

如果他有AQ A9之类的,也许网络牌打不完,现场牌基本还是可以把他们打完的
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

手机版|Archiver|智游城论坛

GMT+8, 2024-12-26 20:19 , Processed in 0.111470 second(s), 8 queries , Redis On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2012 Comsenz Inc.

返回顶部