|
|
嗯，完全同意。
另外，感觉有时候有GTO就偷懒了，而不去根据对手的tendency去做剥削打法。比如昨晚的$1/$2，河牌做的几个GTO call都失败了，但其实如果仔细看对手的tendency的话，可以免掉其中多数的call。有时候，觉得showdown价值特别好的时候，特别想看showdown，就会拿GTO作为借口去说服自己做call，心想既然是GTO，不会太离谱。我觉得这是一个小误区。
short handed table
1) hero in BB with T2o, 4way limpin pot. flop XX2ccc, SB check, hero checks, UTG check, BTN bet 3 into an $8 pot, all call. turn 2. all check. River blank. SB leads $18. GTO-wise I think it's a must call. but considering SB is a tight player and he leads out in a 4way pot, his bluff frequency is very slim. I can only beat the very bottom of his value range, a worse 2. I have to win almost 30%, but I don't think I have 30% equity against his range there.
2) 3way pot. Hero in +1 with A4cc. UTG limp, hero raises to $8, BB & UTG calls. Flop 934hh. check to hero cbet $12. BB calls. UTG fold. turn 9. check, check. River 4. BB leads $18. Again I found myself in a spot where I have to call GTO-wise, since I almost never have a hand better than 4 here, and he can have lots of busted draws. But here the problem is, if he has a draw, he most likely would lead out or c/r in previous streets, so his passive line consists of made hands, and the part of his passive line range that can bet the river almost all beats me. So again, although GTO decision here is technically not wrong, there can be more +EV plays.
3) hero UTG open to $6 with JTo, BB calls. flop K27r, Hero cbets, BB calls. Turn 5, check check. river T. BB leads $10. Here again I almost never have better than T (QQ, JJ I will likely x/c to showdown instead of cbetting). But if we look at that flop, what hands could I beat? I can only beat a crazy float, and even that float would most likely have A high and hence showdown value. so what hands are betting $10 there, almost always a decent K or 2p. |
|
QQ好友和群
QQ空间
腾讯微博
腾讯朋友
微信
收藏
楼主