智游城

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

查看: 12161|回复: 23
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[转] Odd_Oddsen 在highstakeDB的访谈

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
1#
monox0 发表于 2014-12-30 03:47:51 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式

非常长,大致粗略看完以后表示,很有收获。 谁有空的可以帮忙翻译一下哈,一段也行。。

Odd_Oddsen is a Norwegian online poker player who specialises in high stakes Pot Limit Omaha cash games. The player wants to keep anonymity for several reasons. HighstakesDB have had the opportunity of interviewing the player in his first ever interview.

You have become a regular player in high stakes games on PokerStars and Full Tilt over the past six months or so, but most people do not know too much about you. Could you please explain when you were introduced to the game and when you started to play PLO?

I think I was introduced to poker in 2004 although it could have possibly been 2005. I used to rail my brother who played MTTs online and I tried to find leaks (lol). I was only 15 at that time so I couldn’t play online much myself, but he let me take over the control from time to time. As far as me playing poker, I started playing in 2007/2008 (when I turned 18) and I mostly played small stakes MTTs. I had some success in them and grinded some MTT’s for the fun of it until 2009-2010. I had a good run (as usual) and managed to bink some nice scores; I managed to build a $30k roll but then proceeded to bust it in approximately six months or so.

I thought about the situation and evaluated my previous mistakes. I decided to give poker one last serious shot and as a result, I deposited $1,000 and started playing $0.25/$0.50 HUNL. I had great success right from the start and in about a month, I had grinded my roll up to $10k with a 30 buy-in bankroll management rule.

I had also seen and heard that there were other players from Norway who were winning a lot playing high stakes online, but they were playing this ‘weird’ four-card game called PLO. I subsequently decided to start trying to focus on this game instead. I took my $10k bankroll and started playing $0.25/$0.50 PLO; at the same time I ordered some PLO books and Bill Chen’s book "Mathematics of Poker". I think that this is a very good tool for working on your game outside the tables. I soon got really motivated because I knew it was possible to make a lot of money in this game. It was during this time that poker was getting pretty serious for me. I quickly learned that the variance in PLO is way bigger than what it is in NLHE, and therefore I increased my BRM requirements to 100 buy-ins for each stake.

There’s no question of a doubt that the swings in PLO are much more than NLHE and the variance can be crazy. How did you rise through the ranks in the mid-to-high stakes games?

In about six months of playing PLO, I had built a $100k bankroll and was playing $5/$10 on a regular basis. I have had some ups and downs since then but I have always tried to challenge myself versus the best out there; I think that that is the fastest and best way to learn and the competition also incentivises me. I think that most of the bum-hunters are short sighted and the game will pass by them in the long run.

I started taking shots at the $25/$50 games between 2010 and 2012 that went poorly due to not being fully ready (in terms of playing poorly) and also running bad. In hindsight however, I am actually happy now that these shots failed, because I was just not ready for the best regulars out there yet at that time, and this gave me more motivation to getting better and grind more at the lower stakes.

I've played millions of hands at the mid-stakes, which does things with your instincts: for example, you just knew when people are unbalanced (e.g. bad bluffing spots, good triple barreling spots etc.). When I started to play $25/$50, my instincts were not as right/spot on as they were in the mid-stakes. The regulars there had different ranges in different spots and/or more balanced ranges. The good bluffing/triple barrel spots now become bad because they know what you are doing and now that you are unbalanced, they will exploit you! I consequently had three missed shots at $25/$50 but on my fourth ‘shot’ I was ready for it, and as they say “the rest is history”. Retrospectively, running bad during my first shots is actually the best run-good of my life as it gave me a ton of motivation to get better and keep on improving by cutting down on the mistakes.

Its good that it worked out well for you the way it did then. Did you start playing on Euro sites and was it HU or 6-max?

I have mainly played on Pokerstars during my poker career. I have played a bit on some Euro sites as well just to test the waters but I have always had my main volume on Pokerstars because it offers the most and best action by far, and the Pokerstars software is also just amazing for multi-tabling. Furthermore, the rakeback is ~80% when you reach Supernova Elite status which is huge.

I have always played both HU and 6-max. It depends on where the action is. I usually play 6-max because that’s where I get action. If I could get a 12+ table HU match going at a regular basis, I would probably prefer that.

Why have you focused your career on PLO rather than NLHE when the swings are crazier in PLO?

I decided to focus on PLO in 2008-2009 because I saw the potential in this game. I thought that this was going to be the next big thing in poker because many of the NLHE ‘specialists’ had already started to transition to PLO. The game had much more action and gamble in it and people hadn't figured out that much PLO strategy at that time; many different styles were winning.

I also think PLO is a much more fish friendly game than NLHE because of several reasons. A fish can go on mega-heaters in this game whereas in NLHE they usually bust really fast because of the considerably less variance. In NLHE the loose-passive (whatever really) fishes will get punished way more by doing equity mistakes pre-flop (flatting 3-bets with crappy hands OOP and so on) as fishes likes to play hands and see a flop. This makes PLO ideal for them as in PLO these equity mistakes are almost erased, because of how close the hand equities run together. In order to beat fishes you actually also have to play good post flop too; you can’t just wait for hands and 3-bet really strong ranges versus the fish like you can in NLHE if you don’t know how to play post-flop.  This is also making the fish think that they have an edge in this game, which is really good for the games, and this is also somewhat true for the regulars as well.

The fact that fishes go on heaters will make them come back, and it will also make more games run around them for a longer time, which makes PLO a very sustainable game in the long run, unlike NLHE.

It’s also very fascinating that so many styles are winning in PLO; the game isn’t figured out yet, at least 100bb+. The game is also very complex and this analogy maybe stretching it a bit, but I can see many parallels between deep-stacked PLO and chess. PLO is even more complex in my opinion with less set fixed positions and new situations coming up on daily basis. I basically think PLO has a much brighter future than NLHE and that is the main reason why I have been focusing on PLO.

You mentioned the fact that the variance is greater in PLO than NLHE and a player therefore requires more buy-ins for bankroll management. Have you had any major downswings during your career thus far that you wouldn’t mind discussing?

I have had plenty of downswings in my career. I have had two 100+ buy-in downswings and a lot of 50+ buy-in downswings. I think the swings in this game are crazy and I think a lot of people underestimate the swings; you could feel like a hero one day and the next day you could lose 20 buy-ins even if you are playing the best poker of your life. This is why PLO messes with your mind. It is very important to view and analyse your game with as little biasness as possible although this can be hard. Many people do not like to criticise themselves so the ability to view your performance in a neutral perspective is a very important skill in my opinion.

The worst thing about a downswing is not actually losing X amount of money/buy-ins (even though that does hurt a bit) but it can actually be a disaster for your game as you start adjusting your game and come up with new styles, testing new strategies etc. When you are in a downswing or after you have been in one, you could basically be playing a whole different style than what you used to be playing. This is the hardest part to adjust to during a downswing, as you need to focus a lot of attention in trying to keep your game balanced in the same way as before however difficult it may be.

You share some interesting views on how to deal with downswings and being apathetic is certainly helpful in such a situation. It seems like action is increasing in the mixed/draw games so do you intend on learning those games soon or are you going to focus on just PLO for the near future?

I have been trying to learn some mixed games on the side of PLO, especially the draw games, as I am interested in them. I want to get good at them but I’ve over-estimated my skill level especially in Omaha Hi/Lo and really learnt the hard way. I jumped right into those $1,000/$2,000 games on Stars a few months ago and at that time they were running around Isildur1. I lost around $150k in about one hour so I blocked myself from all the highest mixed games for a while.

I am definitely going to give those mixed games another shot when the time is right. I will probably play a bit smaller to start with when the PLO games become dry in order to learn them first.

You are not the first PLO player to jump right into the nosebleed limit games and lose big; Galfond lost $1.7 million “paying his tuition” learning 2-7 triple draw. He has recently launched a new coaching site, are you yourself interested in doing coaching or being signed by a site?

I have had plenty of coaching offers from many sites; all of which I have turned down. I just don’t think that it is profitable for me to make coaching videos at this time, unless I get an exceedingly good offer. I believe that I should focus all my time on playing and working with the game for myself. I may stake and coach some very talented mid-stakes players instead of teaching the whole world to play PLO.

However I might reconsider the situation of joining a coaching site if I get a really good offer in the future, but I want to keep anonymity so that I can have all my options open in the future (here in Norway), hence the offer would have to be extremely good for me to say yes.

Are you friends with any high stakes poker players and if so, how have they helped you improve your game?

I am friends with a couple of high stakes players. I mostly improve on my game myself, but I definitely talk some strategy with some of them. I don’t want to go into much more detail than that.

Do you intend on playing poker after you finish your studies or do you have other plans for your future?

I don’t know how long I am going to continue playing poker but I definitely don't have plans of playing poker for the rest of my life. I am currently finishing up my studies and I will decide what to do in the future once I have my degree. I study part-time at the moment because poker takes up a lot of time and effort. I believe that going to the university to study feels like a break from the game and all the stress around it; I would really recommend other poker players to try studying a bit whilst playing.

The life at the high stakes/nosebleeds is really stressful and personally, I don’t like the fact of having six figure plus swings on a daily basis. I just don’t think that I want to do that for the rest of my life. I would prefer a steady no variance income, but for now, I will at least be around the poker scene for some time before I decide to ‘throw in the towel’. I will stop playing the day I lose motivation of getting better and/or have to force myself to play. Who knows when that day will be? I just know that the day I no longer enjoy playing the game is the day I will quit playing poker.

Its good to hear that you enjoy studying and I believe that other pros have done or are doing what you do by studying part-time whilst playing poker. The most notable name that comes to mind is Sauce. As you moved up the stakes where and how did you face some difficulties?

I progressed from $0.25/$0.50 PLO to $5/$10 PLO pretty smoothly and during the first 12 months I had an EV win rate of 10bb/100 at those stakes, playing a combined 600k hands. I just felt that I owned most of the regulars; however, I struggled a lot at $10/$20 PLO. I think I was stuck taking shots there for more than a year.

I think the main reason behind that was that I was playing way too many tables (16-24), and I did not adjust well enough to the regs there. I was used to playing 16-24 tables at mid-stakes and built very strong instincts; I knew when regs were unbalanced, where they were bluffing too much, where they would fold too much etc. It seemed like second nature to me and it was just instinct after playing so many hands.

When I moved up to $10/$20, those instincts did not work as the regs were more balanced and the spots I was barreling/bluffing at mid-stakes were often bad spots in these games. As a result, I had to really work on my game, plugging leaks again like I was doing when starting out at $0.25/$0.50 PLO. I tried to get more balance in my game and having hands in my range that didn’t make sense etc. I finally started beating the regs at $10/$20 which was the best feeling ever and then I just knew that I had a massive edge.

A similar situation happened to me when moving up to $25/$50 PLO. I am glad that I did run bad and lose the first three times I took shots because if I had won/run good when taking those first shots, I certainly wouldn’t be playing this high today. I can say that for sure.

How did you improve your game going through those stakes - did you watch videos, get coaching, read forums etc.?

I improved mostly by just playing; I have basically learnt poker the hard way. I discovered TwoPlusTwo when I was a regular at $2/$4 PLO, and from there I improved more or less by reading/posting in the forums, and just playing an absurd amount of hands.

Who have been the toughest opponents that you have faced at the high stakes tables both HU and 6-max, and why?

In heads-up: !P0krparty¡, Ben86, urnotindangr2 and Gus Hansen. Gus is my biggest nemesis dollar wise out of all players I’ve played HU and he also gives me a headache at the 6-max tables. He does some very clever plays that tend to confuse me a lot. He is also really good to put the pressure in spots where I have weak ranges and he also knows when to slowdown. He is a really tough player who gives a lot of action.

In 6-max deep stacked: Sauce123, Ben86, Ilari FIN and Isildur1 come first to mind out of the players I’ve played a noteworthy volume against. (Galfond would probably be on this list as well but I haven’t played against him a ton). I won’t go into much detail about how each of them play, but I can tell you that I am not comfortable at all playing deep stacked PLO with these beasts. I also think each of these players represent a unique individual style/gameplay, which makes this game so fun as many styles can win.

In 6-max 30bb/cap: Jeans89, bernard-bb and The Liar. I think all three of these approach 30bb PLO really good. I don’t want to go into more detail than that.

Which game do you prefer the most: deep ante games, cap or shallow stacks?

I prefer playing 100bb+ games for sure. I think shallow stacks are almost unplayable because of the rake and tiny edges. I will however play whatever runs. I don't think shallow/30bb PLO is very fun because it is basically two street poker. The equities run really close together and hence peoples’ edges are getting smaller and smaller. I think 30bb poker will be like a casino game in about a year’s time as no one but the house wins.

I think PLO should be played with at least 100bb+ as the game is so much more fun and complex playing deeper stacked. I think that it is also more fun for people to rail deep-stacked PLO. I don’t think that the shallow (30bb) games that currently run nowadays are good for the PLO community in the long run as well. 30bb PLO has almost turned into a casino game for Stars due to the high rake. It’s really important that the players step up and share their thoughts.

I would like everyone to post their thoughts on the ongoing problems regarding 30bb poker right now at Stars in the 30bb thread, and the high rake in PLO cash games in the Pokerstars thread.

What do you think of the different styles of play in a game like PLO in terms of players like Ilari FIN who say they play on instinct and feel, and others who play purely based on the maths and game theory? Can you also share your thoughts especially in regards to GTO (Game Theory Optimal) strategy.

First of all, I think that Ilari is a lot ‘smarter’ than what people perceive him to be through the media. I believe that he does a great deal of work on his game outside the tables as well, at least more than what people think.

I actually think there are three major different styles in PLO in terms of strategies if you have to define them: ‘a fixed strategy’, ‘an exploitive strategy' and ‘GTO strategy: Game Theory Optimal strategy’.

‘A fixed strategy’ basically means that you are playing the game and the cards you are dealt in your own way regardless of how your opponents play. An example from NLHE: “I always flat AQ from the SB if early position opens regardless of his tendencies and regardless of what I do with the rest of my range.” This is a typically defined as a fixed strategy.

‘An exploitive strategy’ means that you are dictating your strategy based on your opponents’ patterns and tendencies. Same example as above: “If your opponent is opening 100% of hands from EP and never folding to 3-bets, then we should obviously 3-bet AQ for value pre-flop.” Now we are using an exploitive strategy and not a fixed, since we are doing different things in the same situation, based on our opponent’s tendencies.

A ‘Game Theory Optimal Strategy (GTO)’: I actually don’t like this definition since it could be misleading; using an exploiting strategy can be just as game theory optimal as a GTO (Ne) strategy. What I think people mean when referring to a GTO strategy is referring to a strategy that constitutes to Nash equilibrium, which basically means that your opponents can’t benefit from changing their strategies since you are (in theory) perfectly balanced with your ranges. The best your opponents can do (in theory) is to break-even. For example: let’s say you are betting the size of the pot on the river; having a GTO strategy here (being 100% balanced) means that you should be bluffing 33.3% of the time and value-betting 66.6%, so regardless of your opponents decision he is not making any money by calling or folding. Your opponent is break-even on his decision regardless of his action, at least in theory.

Finding and measuring these ranges/frequencies in PLO is extremely difficult because of the complexity of the game; there are 270,725 different starting hands, combine them with 1,712,304 boards combinations, and tell me how to be perfectly balanced for all given choices during a hand including bet sizing, before the time bank runs out on all your tables etc. There are however techniques for making good estimations, but I think many regulars just end up being unbalanced anyways (including myself). I also think some spots come up so infrequently in PLO that being super-balanced should not be very concerning.

I think a GTO strategy is very important versus really tough opponents to kind of ensure yourself that you are at least not losing a ton to a given regular. I also know that this GTO concept is really important
in limit games, but I however think it is much more easier to execute this strategy ‘perfectly’ in the limit games. It is one of the reasons that I believe the limit games are not running regularly nowadays, because it is easier to “measure” ranges and frequencies, because of “limited” choices and significantly fewer combinations, and thus more people have got to a stage of optimal play.

I think most of today’s poker players use a combination between all of these strategies and not one purely. I don’t want to go into detail about how and what my opponents are doing for obvious reasons.

Personally I would say that I play a mixed set of all these three strategies. I do not want to go too much in detail about my game for obvious reasons, but I have my “foundation” (fixed strategy) of things I do with my ranges, and from there I adjust my frequencies based on my opponents’ tendencies with a mixture of ‘exploitive strategy’ and ‘GTO’ depending on my opponents.

It is interesting to hear your thoughts on the different strategies and on Ilari. Sauce has also said that “he plays it up a ton” as regards to acting like a total gambler and making mistakes at the table. You mentioned that poker players are frowned upon in Norway. How did your family react when you told them the stakes that you play?

I can say +1 to Sauce’s comment for Ilari “playing it up”. Frankly, I haven’t told my mum what stakes I play, and she doesn’t really know the amounts of money involved. I do however think she has an idea.

My father is very supportive. He calls me several times during the week and asks how the games have been, how I have been doing, how the other regs have been doing etc. He even used to ask specifically about how that “man with the hat” [patpatman] is doing lol. He also installed Pokerstars onto his laptop so he can sit and rail me from time to time. I remember one day I got a text saying: "Be careful now, that Ilari guy likes to play big pots". That really made me laugh.

Haha, that made me laugh as well. I guess even he knows that Ilari isn’t afraid to gamble as well. How did you manage to play poker for many hours and across multiple tables when you first started playing?

I played a lot of computer games when I was younger, so multitasking skills came very natural to me. I basically had a serious nerve injury back in 2008/2009 and I couldn’t feel my legs for 30 days. I was just sat down all day and I decided to hence play a ton of PLO during that time. I used to have a part-time job whilst studying, but during these 30 days I figured out that I could make considerably much more money in less time by playing this weird four card game sat at home instead of going to my old job. Whilst I was getting better from the injury, I just ended up playing poker, and now that is my part-time job.

It’s good to hear that you have fully recovered from your injury and playing poker must certainly be a better part-time job than your previous one monetary wise. I hope all goes well for you in the future and it was great speaking to you.

Thank you very much.

分享到:  QQ好友和群QQ好友和群 QQ空间QQ空间 腾讯微博腾讯微博 腾讯朋友腾讯朋友 微信微信
收藏收藏
2#
osgoodoz 发表于 2014-12-30 10:46:41 | 只看该作者
外语不灵的表示很头晕
3#
 楼主| monox0 发表于 2014-12-30 15:16:11 | 只看该作者
转了一段有价值的:

您如何看待的不同风格的打法在比赛中像PLO在像的Ilari FIN选手的本能说,他们谁发挥和感觉,和其他人谁玩基于纯粹的数学和博弈论方面?你也可以分享您的想法特别是关于GTO(博弈论最优)的策略。首先,我认为是的Ilari比人们通过媒体认为的他'聪明'很多。我相信他Game之外做了很多功课,至少比人们所认为的更多。其实,我觉得有在PLO三大不同风格的战略方面,如果你有去界定:“一个固定的策略”,“一个剥削战略”和“GTO策略:博弈论的最佳策略”。“一个固定的战略”基本上意味着你在玩游戏,你是在处理自己的方式出牌,无论你的对手怎么打。从NLHE一个例子:“从SB我总是平坦的AQ如果前面位置打开不管他的倾向,也不管我做什么与我的范围内,其余”这是一个通常被定义为一个固定的策略。“一个剥削战略”意味着你使唤你的战略的基础上对手的模式和趋势。如上面同样的例子:“如果你的对手是开放的手从EP的100%,从未折至3投注,那么我们就应该很明显3下注AQ的值前翻牌。”现在,我们使用的是剥削的战略,而不是固定的,因为我们是在做同样的情况不同的事情,根据我们的对手的倾向。A'博弈的最优策略(GTO)“:我其实不喜欢这个定义,因为它可能会产生误导;使用开发策略可以是一样博弈最优的GTO(NE)的策略。我觉得人的意思是指一个GTO策略是指构成纳什均衡,策略时,这基本上意味着你的对手可以改变他们的策略,因为你是(理论上)不利于你的范围内完美平衡。最好你的对手可以做(理论上)是盈亏平衡。例如:假设你是投注在河锅的大小;这里有一个GTO战略(即100%的平衡),意味着你应该唬人的时候33.3%,价值66.6投注%,所以无论你的对手决定他是不是通过电话或折叠赚到钱。你的对手突破,甚至在他的决定,无论他的行动,至少在理论上。发现和测量这些范围/ PLO中的频率,是因为游戏的复杂程度非常困难;有270725不同的起手,将其与1712304板的组合,并告诉我如何成为一个手,在所有给定的选项包括赌大小完美的平衡,时间银行耗尽你所有的表等前然而有技巧取得良好的估计,但是我想很多常客只是最终被不平衡反正(包括我自己)。我也觉得有些斑点拿出所以很少在巴解组织,作为超级平衡不应该是非常令人担忧。我觉得GTO的策略是非常重要对真正强硬的对手种,以确保自己,你至少不会失去一吨给定的规律。我也知道,这GTO的概念是非常重要的在限制游戏,但我却认为这是更容易在限制游戏执行这一战略'完美'。这是我认为的极限游戏不经常运行时下的原因之一,是因为它更容易“措施”的范围,因为“有限”的选择和显著少的组合,因而更多的人与频率,得到了一个舞台最佳发挥。我认为,今天的大多数扑克玩家使用所有这些策略,而不是纯粹的1之间的结合。我不想细讲一下我的对手是如何和什么做的原因很明显。个人而言,我会说,我玩的是一套混合所有这三种策略。我不想去过多的细节我的比赛,原因很明显,但我有事情,我做我的范围我的“基础”(固定策略),并从那里我调整频率的基础上我的对手“的倾向与对“剥削战略”和“GTO”根据我的对手的混合物。
4#
snowsnow 发表于 2014-12-30 16:47:37 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 snowsnow 于 2014-12-30 16:52 编辑

hahahha, google tranalate


PLO -->巴解组织,

一吨(ton)给定的规律

电话(call) 或折叠(fold)赚到钱


时间银行(time bank)耗尽你所有的表等前然而有技巧取得良好的估计

并告诉我如何成为一个手(make a hand)
5#
jimmyking 发表于 2014-12-30 22:44:22 | 只看该作者
6#
 楼主| monox0 发表于 2014-12-30 23:25:11 | 只看该作者
snowsnow 发表于 2014-12-30 16:47
hahahha, google tranalate

谢谢指正,凑合着看
7#
胖子打扑克 发表于 2014-12-31 19:48:32 | 只看该作者
我来试试,不对的地方还请指正

第一个问题:
问:
您在过去大概六个月的时间里已经成为PS和FTP高额桌的常客玩家,
不过大多数人对您还不是很了解。
能说一下您是怎么知道扑克并且是什么时候开始玩PLO的吗?

答:
我想我是2004年但也很可能是2005年才知道扑克这个游戏的。
我曾经给打线上MTT的哥哥做亲友团并尝试帮他找漏洞(LOL)。
我当时只有15岁,所以我自己是不大能打线上游戏的,
但我哥常常让我帮他打。
我是直到2007/2008年才开始打扑克的,当时打得最多的是MTT。
我取得了一些成绩,而直到2009-2010年还只是娱乐地在打。
在一个上风中(一如既往)我取得了一些非常亮眼的成绩;
建立了一个30K的BR,但是在随后大约半年时间里就破产了。
我痛定思痛回顾了以前的一些错误。
然后决定最后再给扑克一个机会,结果存了1K刀开始打$0.25/$0.50的NL单挑。
结果取得了极大的成功,把BR打到了10K,
根据资金管理原则我拥有了30个买入的资金。
我看过也听说过其他挪威玩家在线上打高额现金并且盈利颇丰,
但是他们打的是一个四张牌的“怪异”游戏,叫PLO。
随后我决定开始尝试着眼于这个游戏。
我把10K资金投入到PLO,开始打$0.25/$0.50这个级别;
同时买了一些PLO的书以及Bill Chen的“扑克中的数学”。
我认为这是在桌下提高自己牌技的极好工具。
很快我就有了真正的动力,因为我知道这个游戏可能给我带来很好的盈利。
就在这段时间里,打扑克对我来说成为了非常严肃的事情。
我很快意识到PLO的起伏比德州无限注扑克要大得多,
所以我把每个级别所需的资金管理提升到100个买入。

评分

1

查看全部评分

8#
 楼主| monox0 发表于 2014-12-31 23:59:57 | 只看该作者
胖子打扑克 发表于 2014-12-31 19:48
我来试试,不对的地方还请指正

第一个问题:

胖子你一定要善始善终啊~  给个建议,可以先Google translate 然后再把一些term 改一改~ 这样会快一点。
我觉得这篇文章看3遍,水平肯定可以上1个level.
9#
 楼主| monox0 发表于 2015-1-1 00:16:01 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 monox0 于 2015-1-1 00:20 编辑

我来接一段哈:

问:毫无疑问,在PLO的波动比NLHE大很多。你是怎么快速升级到中等和高级别的游戏的?

答:在半年左右时间,我已经建立了一个10万美元的资金,并常常玩$ 5 /10级别。从那时起我的成绩就有一些起伏,但我一直都在挑战那些最好的选手;我认为这是学习最快,最好的方式,对抗也让我获利颇丰。我认为,那些“渔夫”是目光短浅的,长远来讲他们将被这个游戏淘汰。我开始玩时,在2010年和2012年间尝试过几次25/ $50级别的游戏,由于没有完全准备好(打得不好),结果都不尽人意。不过事后看来,我其实很高兴,现在这些尝试失败了,只是因为在那个时候我没有准备好对付那里最好的常客,这给了我更多的动力越来越好,在低级别杀怪练级了更久。我在中等级别打了几百万手牌:例如,你会知道,当人们犯不平衡的错误时(如不好的诈唬时机,好的三道街诈唬时机等)。当我开始打$ 25/50美元,我的直觉就不像在中等级别时候那么准了。那里的常客们在不同的情况下会有不同的和更加平衡的range。以前一些好的bluff/三条街barrel的时机,现在变成坏事了,因为他们知道你在做什么,现在你是不平衡的,他们会利用你!我连续三次尝试25美元/50美元失败了,但我第四次“出手”时已经准备好了,正如人们常说的:“剩下的就是历史了(哥只是个传说)。”回顾之前,第一次尝试运气极差其实是对我人生很好的运气,因为它给了我超级多的动力去变得更好,并且通过减少错误来提高自己的水平。
10#
kktao 发表于 2015-1-2 00:07:34 | 只看该作者
很好的文章啊。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

手机版|Archiver|智游城论坛

GMT+8, 2024-11-13 06:19 , Processed in 0.067503 second(s), 8 queries , Redis On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2012 Comsenz Inc.

返回顶部