I would prefer a small bet-call in this spot e.g. 1/3-1/2 pot, you get value from his pair, trips, and induce a bluff from his missed range because your bet would look like a blocker/thin-value bet. And this small bet is also balanced on your end because it makes sense to bet all your monsters this way too(but your opponent might not know that).
To induce bluff by checking rv is bad, because it looks too much like you were x/c-ing. There's almost no hand you donk turn and just give up rv, you would bet all air and monsters on the rv. So if a good reg bets against your rv check, it might very well be -EV for you to call.
On the other hand when you bet small on the river, your range can still be perceived as containing a cheap stab with missed draws just in case villain also has a missed draw, and villain knows that and might very well attempt a rebluff because lots of ppl feel very uncomfortable giving up to a smallish bet with missed draws.
作者: 夜猫 时间: 2015-5-22 08:19
pongba 发表于 2015-5-22 05:50
I would prefer a small bet/call in this spot e.g. 1/3-1/2 pot, you get value from his pair, trips, a ...
大概意思看明白了，河牌的过牌对手反而以为你会check-call，而不会咋呼，如果像你说的，河牌打30%或50%pot，是不是一个bet-fold？还是一个bet-call？作者: pongba 时间: 2015-5-22 08:21
I would bet/call against such an aggro opponent, because the small bet serves as a value bet *and* inducement, he should have more bluff in his raise range than if you check.作者: sexrange 时间: 2015-5-22 09:50
河牌BET对手push，你能call？如果是induce bluff，牌力还是不支持这个300BB的pot的。我可以说如果河牌被raise回来，bluff的概率不到20%。大部分drawmiss都会放弃。另楼主没说说明自己的数据。我无从判断河牌行动的正确性。但能打NL2000，高手无疑。